Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology software allows the dissection of oral microbial diversity

Authors

  • Nik Norliza Nik Hassan School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia Author
  • Rozita Hassan School of Dentistry, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia Author
  • Zuliani Mahmood School of Dentistry, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia Author
  • NurWaliyuddin Hanis Zainal Abidin School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia Author
  • Kaamini Ravy School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia Author

Keywords:

Metagenomic Analysis, open-reference Operational taxonomic units (OTU), Quantitative insights into microbial ecology (QIIME), taxonomy

Abstract

Objective: Recent approach based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence, which bypasses the need for culturing was being used to assess the diversity and relative abundance of bacteria in the carious patients. Here, we report the use of 16S rRNA V3-V4 marker gene approach to dissect the oral microbial diversity in patients’ caries. Methods: A total of 8 subjects with caries aged between 20-30 years old from Dental Clinic, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan were recruited. The DNA from collected plaque samples were examined by high-throughput sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene using MiSeq sequencing platform. For 16S rRNA amplicon analysis, the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) programme was utilised and the Greengenes database was used for taxonomy classification. Results: By using this platform, we identified six top communities of microbial in the caries samples. Protobacteria OTUs were most dominant in all samples with abundance value of (47.4%), followed by Firmicutes (21%), Bacteroidetes (15.6%), Actinobacteria (7.5%) and Fusobacteria (5.2%) and TM7 (3.2%). Conclusion: The QIIME is a robust platform that is able to support a wide range of microbial community analyses and to classify the oral microbial taxa in the taxonomic hierarchy i.e. from kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus to species level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aas, J. A., Paster, B. J., Stokes, L. N., Olsen, I., & Dewhirst, F. E. (2005) ‘Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity’, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 43(11), pp. 5721–5732. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721-5732.2005.

Ahn, J., Yang, L., Paster, B. J., Ganly, I., Morris, L., Pei, Z., & Hayes, R. B. (2011) ‘Oral microbiome profiles: 16s rRNA pyrosequencing and microarray assay comparison’, PLoS ONE, 6(7), pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022788.

Bennett, K. W. and Eley, A. (1993) ‘Fusobacteria: New taxonomy and related diseases’, Journal of Medical Microbiology, 39(4), pp. 246–254. doi: 10.1099/00222615-39-4-246.

Bik, E. M., Long, C. D., Armitage, G. C., Loomer, P., Emerson, J., Mongodin, E. F., Nelson, K. E., Gill, S. R., Fraser-Liggett, C. M., & Relman, D. A. (2010) ‘Bacterial diversity in the oral cavity of 10 healthy individuals’, ISME Journal, 4(8), pp. 962–974. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.30.

Chakravorty, S., Helb, D., Burday, M., & Connell, N. (2007) ‘A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria’, J Microbiol Methods., 69(2), pp. 330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.02.005.A.

Chaudhary, N., Sharma, A. K., Agarwal, P., Gupta, A., & Sharma, V. K. (2015) ‘16S classifier: A tool for fast and accurate taxonomic classification of 16S rRNA hypervariable regions in metagenomic datasets’, PLoS ONE, 10(2), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116106.

Dewhirst, F. E., Chen, T., Izard, J., Paster, B. J., Tanner, A. C. R., Yu, W. H., Lakshmanan, A., & Wade, W. G. (2010) ‘The human oral microbiome’, Journal of Bacteriology, 192(19), pp. 5002–5017. doi: 10.1128/JB.00542-10.

Graspeuntner, S., Loeper, N., Künzel, S., Baines, J. F., & Rupp, J. (2018) ‘Selection of validated hypervariable regions is crucial in 16S-based microbiota studies of the female genital tract’, Scientific Reports, (June), pp. 4–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27757-8.

Jiang, Q., Liu, J., Chen, L., Gan, N., & Yang, D. (2019) ‘The oral microbiome in the elderly with dental caries and health’, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 9(JAN). doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00442.

Peterson, S. N., Snesrud, E., Liu, J., Ong, A. C., Kilian, M., Schork, N. J., & Bretz, W. (2013) ‘The Dental Plaque Microbiome in Health and Disease’, PLoS ONE, 8(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058487.

Rajilić-Stojanović, M. and de Vos, W. M. (2014) ‘The first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota’, FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 38(5), pp. 996–1047. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12075.

Ventura, M., Canchaya, C., Tauch, A., Chandra, G., Fitzgerald, G. F., Chater, K. F., & van Sinderen, D. (2007) ‘Genomics of Actinobacteria: Tracing the Evolutionary History of an Ancient Phylum’, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 71(3), pp. 495–548. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00005-07.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-13

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology software allows the dissection of oral microbial diversity. (2024). Malaysian Journal of Human Genetics, 2(2), 25-31. https://mjhg.kk.usm.my/index.php/journal/article/view/29

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 11

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.